Unicondylar Knee Replacement
 |
Total knee replacement
is a commonly done, reliable operation that has been proven effective for
the treatment of advanced arthritis of the knee. In spite of its obvious
virtues, the operation has definite disadvantages. While it is performed
much more quickly, safely, and reliably now than it was 10 years ago, it
is still a major joint reconstruction. It requires a large incision, commonly
involves significant blood loss that can lead to transfusion, poses important
pain management issues in the postoperative period, and can require months
of extensive and sometimes painful rehabilitation. |
 |
There are
certain, very specific circumstances where a smaller, partial knee replacement
can be as effective as total knee replacement. These partial knee replacements
are called "unicondylar knee replacements." They incorporate many
of the principles and foundations of total knee replacement. Painful, degenerated
joint surfaces are replaced with metal and plastic and poorly aligned knees
are realigned to a more advantageous position.
|
However, there is much less surgical dissection and bone loss with unicondylar
knee replacements. Accordingly, there is also less blood loss, less postoperative
pain, and less postoperative swelling. Range of motion is achieved earlier with
less pain and less physical therapy. All of ligaments of the knee are retained,
and unicondylar knee replacements tend to feel more like "normal knees"
than do many standard knee replacements.
<< Back to Minimally Invasive Joint Replacement
|